A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving potential neighbours over the construction of a wall in a coastal site within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national consideration next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental concerns, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier and the Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a really publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, seek out to construct their family members house. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, the place advancement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of established inhabitants. Based on the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being built by their prospective neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted under setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their website, bringing about an encroachment on a Distinctive Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore places are issue to stringent controls below European and Irish environmental law. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have Long lasting ecological implications, specially in a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially constructed, is in the right placement. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal organizing disputes, the place views of the sea are each very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic endeavours by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the location, In keeping with sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-substantial water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, an image that has considering the fact that develop into emblematic on the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible proof on the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o in the course of intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the location turned Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of actions ended up cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached on.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were coated in detail with the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to grasp the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to even more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders should be granted to halt construction pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute from the authorized timeline.
With the core in the dispute is actually a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve which the wall, as manufactured, goes further than what was permitted and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of planning files, maps, and problems attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental security and adherence to setting up law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public view, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their very long-standing connection to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few simply seeking to build a household home in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on a Specific Area of Conservation and say that all performs are actually carried out depending on Qualified advice and accepted strategies. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with entering the sea throughout a storm, don't change the underlying details.
The case has also raised broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Occasions article about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Beforehand been associated with nearby advocacy on planning and environmental difficulties, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from very unique Skilled backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-substantial h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Times and René Collier waded by way of midsection-high water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both of those the physical reality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme technique.
As being the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to ascertain whether or not the wall as designed complies with setting up authorization and no matter if any encroachment right into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and scheduling circumstances. Still the human aspect stays central: neighbours who should Reside along with each other long once the legal costs have been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above design will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, although the implications of the case increase over and above that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how speedily an area disagreement can escalate when basic challenges including environmental security and home rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre on the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether it is going to in the long run be altered, removed, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely proceed to seem in headlines, linked indelibly to The most carefully watched arranging Rene Collier disputes in north Dublin lately.