A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between future neighbours above the development of the wall at a coastal internet site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide focus next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family residence at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of planning breaches, environmental fears, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions report about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a very publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than building functions at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a business director respectively, request to build their household household. The situation has become emblematic of wider disputes along Ireland’s coastline, exactly where advancement pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of recognized inhabitants. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining constructed by their prospective neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted under arranging authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally people of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their organizing permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their internet site, leading to an encroachment over a Unique Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore places are issue to stringent controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Of their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments might have Long lasting ecological consequences, especially inside of a delicate coastal ecosystem which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach in their arranging permission, and say the wall, that's partly created, is in the correct place. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion as an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful improvement. The pair accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding so that you can protect their perspective, an allegation which has been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal arranging disputes, the place views of the sea are both extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable endeavours from the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, As outlined by sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Periods. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by midsection-higher water throughout a storm to photograph the website Irish Situations, an image which has due to the fact develop into emblematic on the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't just symbolic; they were meant to Obtain Visible evidence of your wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Times described, describing how the two Adult men entered the drinking water throughout critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the positioning turned Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from courtroom reporting. The Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely famous that such steps were being cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been protected in detail with the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become widely searched phrases as viewers sought to comprehend the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court heard additional submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute while in the authorized timeline.
On the core from the dispute is actually a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain the wall, as produced, goes over and above what was accredited and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be described as meticulous in his assessment of organizing documents, maps, and conditions connected into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally pressured that their action is inspired by issue for environmental safety and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public check out, insisting as a substitute that it's about making sure that progress at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've explained their extended-standing relationship to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple merely wanting to establish a loved ones residence in accordance With all the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Exclusive Location of Conservation and say that all is effective happen to be carried out based on Expert suggestions and permitted designs. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, never alter the fundamental specifics.
The situation has also lifted broader questions about how planning disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above design of wall at coastal web site has become a shorthand description for your circumstance that numerous observers see as progressively widespread. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation involving private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become more contentious.
The Irish Occasions post about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Formerly been associated with community advocacy on arranging and environmental issues, though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from incredibly distinctive Specialist backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these types of disputes. René Paul Feely accountant Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, became synonymous With all the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from the sea Irish Situations protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-substantial h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by way of midsection-significant h2o all through a storm to photograph the site Irish Times are phrases that appeared frequently in protection, reflecting both equally the Bodily actuality of the coastline as well as symbolic character from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an extreme technique.
As being the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The court docket will have to determine whether or not the wall as built complies with preparing permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning conditions. Nonetheless the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who need to Dwell alongside one another very long once the lawful charges are already paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development is effective at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case extend outside of that deal with. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. Additionally, it underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when essential problems for example environmental safety and assets rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of normal attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre on the dispute stands partially crafted, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. Regardless of whether it will eventually eventually be altered, eliminated, or completed as planned will rely on the court docket’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will possible continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to The most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.